U.S. Supreme Court Determines CFPB Funding Structure Is Constitutional

This week, the U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Community Financial Services Association of America ruled in a 7-2 decision that the current funding structure for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) is constitutional. There were specifically two trade groups challenging the structure of the CFPB funding. Those two trade groups claimed that the CFPB funding structure violated the Appropriations Clause of the Constitution. The CFPB is funded from Federal Reserve profits, and it is not funded based on an annual appropriation like other federal agencies. The court provided that Congress’ authorization for the CFPB to be funded by the Federal Reserve does not violate the Appropriations Clause. SCOTUS held that “Congress’ statutory authorization allowing the Bureau to draw money from the earnings of the Federal Reserve System to carry out the Bureau’s duties satisfies the Appropriations Clause.” 
To learn more about the ruling, please see the full SCOTUS opinion.

Advertisement

source

Compare listings

Compare
Real Estate Diann
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.